In an age of global warming, which cities will be able to withstand the effects of a changing climate?
It’s not easy to say, given how the climate system is so complex and complex it’s difficult to even define the exact effects.
That’s why the U.S. Census Bureau’s Bureau of the Census has a new tool called the Land Use Scorecard, which measures how climate change will affect a city’s overall climate and infrastructure.
The scorecard, designed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Climate Change and Urban Planning Program, aims to better understand how cities are responding to climate change and its impact on their citizens.
But its main objective is to help cities make better decisions about how to deal with the changes in the climate.
“Cities are really in the middle of this.
They’re trying to decide whether or not to invest in infrastructure or how to adapt to this,” said Scott Linscott, a climate change professor at the University at Buffalo.
“So if we want to get to a sustainable future, we have to start from scratch.”
That means cities can’t simply wait for the federal government to step in and help them address climate change.
“There’s going to be a lot of decisions that need to be made,” said Linsdale, who’s also the director of the Climate Change Institute at the Brookings Institution.
“That’s a huge challenge.”
How the Land Uses Scorecard works There are several criteria that cities use to score climate impacts.
For example, they can score if they’re already experiencing increased flooding or snow accumulation, or if they have to make repairs to infrastructure.
Linscot said that, in some cases, the scores can be used to compare different cities, with different standards for water quality and other factors.
For cities that are already dealing with climate change, those scores are less helpful, and they’re likely to be more accurate.
But, in general, climate impacts can be more complicated to identify.
LINSCOTT: So how do we make these different cities more accurate?
Because they’re all going to have to deal in some ways with different climate impacts, and that’s a lot harder to predict, he said.
The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Fifth Assessment Report is a comprehensive assessment of climate change published in 2013, and the scorecard is intended to help those with more experience and expertise in this area better understand the impact of climate changes on cities and the people living in them.
The report found that a 10-point scale is the “baseline” for assessing climate impacts in each country.
In most countries, it’s between 5 and 7, depending on where you live.
But in some countries, like France and Spain, the baseline is as high as 14, Linscott said.
“These are really high thresholds, and I think we need to get more accurate scores for those places.”
That’s where the Land uses Scorecard comes in.
The program then gives cities the chance to take a climate impact score from their local government and create a climate adaptation score from the scorecards scores, based on those scores.
In the end, Lockscott said, those numbers should give cities a better idea of how they can adapt to climate impacts and the threats that come with them.
But some of the scores are based on only one metric, while others take a mix of different metrics.
That means the score cards that cities can use to determine climate impacts are only one way to identify them, Lenscott said.
But he also noted that the scores they can use in making climate adaptation decisions are more precise than what the U,N.
recommends, and can be as accurate as 10 percent.
That is, if a city has to make a major infrastructure repair, the climate impacts score would be higher than the score for the project.
The Climate Adaptation Scorecard will be available in a few cities this year, including New York, Boston and Washington, D.C. It will also be available for use by the states of Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Mexico, New York and Texas.
The Scorecard is available to download here.
Follow Rachel Browne on Twitter: @rachelbrowne